<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Solvency II: harmoniser or destroyer?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://solvencyiiwire.com/solvency-ii-harmoniser-or-destroyer/1598/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://solvencyiiwire.com/solvency-ii-harmoniser-or-destroyer/1598</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 10:52:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Solvency II and the work of the Board &#124; Solvency II Wire</title>
		<link>http://solvencyiiwire.com/solvency-ii-harmoniser-or-destroyer/1598#comment-314</link>
		<dc:creator>Solvency II and the work of the Board &#124; Solvency II Wire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 21:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solvencyiiwire.com/?p=1598#comment-314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] being a principles based regulation, Solvency II should be applied in a way that reflects the “nature, scale and complexity” of the risks the firm faces (the Proportionality [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] being a principles based regulation, Solvency II should be applied in a way that reflects the “nature, scale and complexity” of the risks the firm faces (the Proportionality [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
