
The merits of partial implementation of Solvency II.
Read More »

The merits of partial implementation of Solvency II.
Read More »

How will firms and industries manage the latest delay?
Read More »

Changes and impacts of updated reporting templates
Read More »
Details of EIOPA and FSA consultations, November 2011 – CP008, CP009, CP11/23 & CP11/24.
Read More »

Stress and scenario testing must be preformed regularly under Solvency II. These will include reverse stress tests – effectively stress testing the business to destruction.
Read More »

The announcement by the FSA on 4 October that it has revised its implementation assumptions for Solvency II may have implications for regulators across Europe.
Read More »

Part two: will Solvency II bring the Board too close to the firm?
Read More »

The principle of proportionality is essential for applying Solvency II to match the size and risk profile of the entity. Currently there is not enough guidance on how it will be applied, prompting many SMEs to ask: will Solvency II be a harmoniser or destroyer?
Read More »
Covered bonds, captives, credit ratings, tweets. "US proposals would add student or car loans that could attract different investors drawn to risk rather than stability.”
Read More »
Contents: Level 2 implementation, reporting & stress testing , market survey Markets and reporting key concerns for Level 2 The effect on markets and the reporting burden on insurers are among the main concerns expressed by respondents to the European Commission’s consultation on the Level 2 implementing measures for Solvency II. A summary of the...
Read More »